| By way of introduction to this subject you may wish to roll your cursor over the cowslips image to the right.
If you cannot see the difference then there is no point in worrying about depth-of-field but if you have an opinion about which image you prefer then you have made a creative decision. It is not a question of which one is ‘best’ – there is no ‘best’ they are just different and illustrate things in a different way. I was privilaged to be involved with a guy that asked for some help regarding his photography. We were talking about equipment and I asked if he had a depth-of-field preview button on his camera. He smiled and said that he had only just discovered it the other day. He was new to photography but many people that have been enjoying photography for years never use it! Why not? Playing with depth-of-field is one of the most creative tools we have with a camera. I automatically check depth of field for nearly every image I shoot. That is because I like to make creative decisions rather than allowing the camera to do its own thing. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
| In this situation I used a small aperture (f22). The great depth-of-field meant that the spider became confused with the background. | In this situation I used a large aperture (f4). The narrow depth-of-field meant that the background was thrown out of focus leaving the spider to stand out. |
Do you regularly use depth-of-field in a creative way? Do you find this sort of post stimulates your creativity? |



by David Boag
3 comments
link to this post email a friend